Against the prevailing ideology (or philosophy) of the XVIIIth century
–also called ‘The Age of Reason’, the epoch of the enlightenment, the time of
the exaltation of the norm, science, logic, etc–, the sentimental novel
exalted feeling above reason. By doing so, it paved the way to the romanticism
literature, becoming a forerunner of the gothic novel itself.
Armstrong, Nancy. Desire and Domestic Fiction : A Political History of the Novel. New York: Oxford University Press 1989, 1987.
Samuels, Shirley, ed. The Culture of Sentiment: Race, Gender, and Sentimentality in Nineteenth-Century England. New York : Oxford University Press, 1992. PS 217 S55 C85 1992.
This fact does not imply that the sentimental novel was not a
bourgeois genre, or that it did not serve the interests of the ideology of that
social class that gave rise to the novel, or that it is not a realist genre; in
my modest opinion, it was indeed a realist genre. Richardson, for example,
responded to the concerns and needs of the middle classes, and used the
language and the topics of the middle classes. But probably, the middle classes
of the 1840s were more interested in intimate and human ‘transactions’ than in
commercial transactions, that is, more interested in human relationships
than in economic relations. Perhaps –and if it is allowed to add a note of
sarcasm– people at this time had enough money and wealth and did not have to
worry about those “materialistic” and “chrematistic” values. They finally
had time for their sentiments, for human and private ‘transactions’. Their
parents, the older generation, the Defoes and the novelists and middle
classes of the early Augustan Age did probably not have so much time for this
private and intimate “business”: they were too busy creating the economic
and political establishment or system that their children –the new middle
classes, the Richarsons, for instance– were now enjoying. In other words, the
older generation had to spend all their time with, and based their novels
on, economic and commercial transactions and, maybe not public or political
affairs. To some kind of reading public, this change of topics make probably
the sentimental novel more interesting than ‘the realist novel’ written in
Defoe’s times. The next clip explains --even though it does it in Spanish-- what the sentimental novel is.
These observations are by no means intended to
undervalue the sentimental novel. Neither are they intended to
reduce the realist value of the sentimental novels written at that time.
They shared with the rest of the realist novels not only style and
content, but also a firm teaching purpose. As a matter of fact, they were
welcomed by politicians, intellectuals and even clergymen as an ethical
project, as a very efficient instrument for the sentimental education of the
new society. The fact that they paved the way to the romantic rebellion of the
following generation of artists and intellectuals is once again evidence of an
undisputed truth: in each literary movement, trend, fashion... grows the seed
of its overcoming or, sometimes, its destruction.
Samuel Richardson remains a vital figure in the
history of the novel and of ideology. He initiates a discourse on sexual roles
which, with all its ambiguities, is as important to nowadays’ reading public as
it was in the mid-eighteenth century. His epistolary novel, Pamela (1740), was not a sudden
innovation; novels in the form of letter were of fashion in France, and they
had been popular for several decades, like Aphra Behn’s Love Letters between a Nobleman and his Sister. Richardson wanted
to raise the tone of the literary works from the level of this kind of subject
matter, and in doing so; he created a heroine for the times, a woman of
feelings. Poor but virtuous, Pamela suffers a series of trials at the hands of
Mr B, culminating in attempted rape. The contrast between female submission,
which becomes a paragon of virtue and chastity admired by all in the novel, and
male domination, with its implied sensuality, was immediately criticised as hypocritical,
and parodied by Henry Fielding in Shamela.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Works Cited
Armstrong, Nancy. "The Rise of the Domestic Woman." Rpt. in The Ideology
of Conduct: Essays on Literature and the History of Sexuality, ed. Nancy
Armstrong and Leonard Tennenhouse. New York: Methuen, 1987. Armstrong, Nancy. Desire and Domestic Fiction : A Political History of the Novel. New York: Oxford University Press 1989, 1987.
Samuels, Shirley, ed. The Culture of Sentiment: Race, Gender, and Sentimentality in Nineteenth-Century England. New York : Oxford University Press, 1992. PS 217 S55 C85 1992.
I especially like the first part of your post. I think your clip selection offers only a biased picture of the sentimental plot where you often find the woman to be the victim of male power and not the opposite.
ReplyDeletePlease see below for some minor mistakes and/or typos:
You mean the 1740s, don't you?
"the Richardsons"
"this change of topics makes probably"
"in the form of letters"
"a woman of feeling"
GRADE: 5